When meetings begin to withdraw from the program established it is an error that harms all attendees because the waste of time involved.
Sometimes it happens that who leads the meeting is precisely the focus of inefficiency and who is hurting the development of the meeting.
In this situation it can be daunting question a superior , however, can be done without question his authority.
In fact, resorting to revise the standard procedure for planning a meeting, ie, invite the right people, sending pre-work, and the development of an agenda, will help us bring back the regeneration of the meeting.
In fact, as we focus on procedures nobody can see or wronged nor can identify as a personal attack . What we propose is to offer some quick assessment mechanisms to help who leads the meeting to reach their own conclusions.
Never forget that all participants are responsible for maintaining effective meetings, not only those who lead.